| Absurd Minds http://forums.absurdminds.net/ |
|
| Another interesting overwatch case http://forums.absurdminds.net/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=2806 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Amaroq [ 24 Oct 2014 07:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Another interesting overwatch case |
This one has commentary so you'll automatically know how I voted, but I thought it was interesting enough to share anyway. [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZmsjUX90_w[/youtube] |
|
| Author: | KamiKaze [ 25 Oct 2014 02:40 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Another interesting overwatch case |
i would have thought he had pretty bad walls cause even with those aim/trigger bots they should atleast hit the first 2 shots. |
|
| Author: | Traviesaurus [ 25 Oct 2014 19:49 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Another interesting overwatch case |
Everything should have been Insufficient Evidence. Even in the video at the end of the overwatch, neither of you were sure. That's why it shouldn't have been "Evident Beyond a Reasonable Doubt", because it wasn't. Are we supposed to be commenting on these? |
|
| Author: | Amaroq [ 25 Oct 2014 20:00 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Another interesting overwatch case |
Sure, feel free to comment. |
|
| Author: | Amaroq [ 28 Oct 2014 06:49 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Another interesting overwatch case |
Quote: That's why it shouldn't have been "Evident Beyond a Reasonable Doubt", because it wasn't.
I personally thought it was evident beyond a reasonable doubt after watching it a few times, especially after hearing Jero's thoughts on it. His crosshair was doing some wonky things. I certainly did have some doubts, especially before testing the recoil myself, but I don't know that those doubts were reasonable since I've been playing cs long enough that I generally know what a person's recoil can and can't do. As I've never used hacks, though, I sometimes doubt myself even in the face of the evidence, which in my opinion is unreasonably allowing my emotions to color the actual video.
|
|
| Author: | Traviesaurus [ 28 Oct 2014 08:23 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Another interesting overwatch case |
Quote: As I've never used hacks, though, I sometimes doubt myself even in the face of the evidence, which in my opinion is unreasonably allowing my emotions to color the actual video.
The range and quality of hacks makes it so you'd have to actually be a hacker to know most of them anyway.I define 'hacker' above as somebody who pays a website to have an arsenal of hacks and frequently tries new hacks. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-04:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|