| Absurd Minds http://forums.absurdminds.net/ |
|
| "Lit" http://forums.absurdminds.net/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=2982 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Amaroq [ 24 Feb 2015 15:35 ] |
| Post subject: | "Lit" |
IMO, "lit" should only be used when one shot will kill a person. Eg, you did 89 damage, or even 76 or whatever. "Hurt" should be used for anything else. Comments? |
|
| Author: | GoatMips [ 24 Feb 2015 15:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
I have always related "lit" to being 50+ damage against an individual. So if that user gets an assist, that user lit the opponent. |
|
| Author: | Amaroq [ 24 Feb 2015 16:33 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
You get an assist doing 41 or more damage. |
|
| Author: | GoatMips [ 24 Feb 2015 16:34 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
Quote: You get an assist doing 41 or more damage.
That is good to know.
|
|
| Author: | Redman113 [ 24 Feb 2015 17:05 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
Lit for me is 70+ Hurt/Damaged is 40+ |
|
| Author: | -r0b07 [ 24 Feb 2015 20:18 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
Lit 70+ Sparked 70 and below |
|
| Author: | jero [ 24 Feb 2015 20:20 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
I say "Hit" which I guess I should make a habit of saying tagged, or hurt more often. Sounds too close to Lit, and is very misleading. |
|
| Author: | serialp0rt [ 24 Feb 2015 21:01 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
I think lit should be 70+. |
|
| Author: | Joshy [ 24 Feb 2015 21:40 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
Lit is 60 for me. Under 60 is "Wow, what the fuck. I shot him multiple times. He's hit for 26 in banana, go kill him please." |
|
| Author: | Amaroq [ 24 Feb 2015 22:04 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
60 is too little to be lit. |
|
| Author: | mutiny [ 24 Feb 2015 23:33 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
Why not just say "Hit for 60" or whatever? Saying hurt or lit doesn't help much. |
|
| Author: | Amaroq [ 25 Feb 2015 00:02 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
Quote: Why not just say "Hit for 60" or whatever? Saying hurt or lit doesn't help much.
Because it's way quicker and still gives the same information. There is no practical difference between 60 damage and 65 damage, for example - you still know you need a few shots to kill them. There is a practical difference between "lit" and "hurt", though, because IMO lit should be reserved for somebody who can be killed with a single shot or a nade.
|
|
| Author: | Insanity [ 25 Feb 2015 00:05 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
i usually just say hit then the amount of damage. so "hit 60" etc |
|
| Author: | Traviesaurus [ 25 Feb 2015 02:15 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
I say lit if they have 1 hit of health left. It depends on my teammates gun. A bizon? 30hp is lit. A deagle? 40hp is lit. A glock? 15-20 hp is lit. An awp? EVERYBODY IS LIT! If I tell an awper that somebody is lit, that means pistol him. |
|
| Author: | InstantKarma [ 25 Feb 2015 16:17 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Lit" |
I always considered red health bars to be lit - so I guess 80 damage? Essentially, I try to convey that one shot from any weapon should kill them. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-04:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|